Aston Martin is a name which would now only be remembered by motoring historians and enthusiastic anoraks had it not been for the intervention of the Ford Motor Company, a benevolent provider of mainly ordinary machinery to the masses, but a company that has always given free rein to the dreamers in its ranks.
Ford bought the Newport Pagnell company because it had the skills to turn out great sporting cars, using traditional methods, and sought after by the rich and famous.
With the reawakening of demand for luxury sports cars, it quickly turned into a viable project.
In March 1996, the V8 Coupe was paraded before bulging Swiss wallets at the Geneva Motor Show. It uses a 5.3 litre, V8-engine developing 350 bhp capable of hitting 60 mph in under six seconds, takes 15 weeks to complete and is subjected to a massive 438 quality checks. Hence part of the explanation for its #140,000 price tag.
But the new convertible launched at the same time, the DB7 Volante, turned out to be the real money spinner.
Using the classic sports car drive train of front engine and rear drive, the DB7 is fitted with a supercharged six-cylinder 24-valve engine to produce a top speed in excess of 160mph and costs #89,950, almost bargain basement by Aston standards.
Over 200 DB7s went west to North America last year as the company's total output topped 800 cars, the highest production figure in its 85-year history. The convertible version of the DB7 is like the coupe in all important areas, but it comes with an electrically-operated hood, Connolly leather and burr walnut fascia. It also has the classically simple styling that guarantees it can be sold in its present form for years before it looks dated.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article