Controversial ''sex and wrecks'' movie Crash was passed for release uncut by the British Board of Film Classification last night.
Board director James Ferman said the ''unusual and disturbing film'' was neither illegal nor harmful.
The BBFC showed the film - which depicts characters sexually aroused by car crashes - to a top lawyer, forensic psychologist, and audience of disabled people before granting it an 18 certificate.
David Cronenberg's film was described as ''beyond the bounds of depravity'' in one newspaper. It was greeted with a storm of critical revulsion and criticism, and London's Westminster Council provisionally banned it.
However, film-makers rallied to its defence in the name of artistic freedom.
A spokeswoman for distributors Columbia Tristar said: ''The film has already opened all over the world without any cuts and we are pleased that British audiences will also be able to see it.''
She said that it would be some time before a release date was fixed with cinemas.
Unusually, the BBFC published its long and detailed finding, in which it said Cronenberg treated his theme ''with clinical detachment.''
It said: ''The car crashes are stripped of exciting spectacle.
''The mood is often slow and dreamlike, and the audience is not encouraged to share the feelings of the characters.''
The QC consulted by the BBFC found that ''rather than sympathising or identifying with the attitudes or tastes of the characters in this film, the average viewer would in the end be repelled by them, and would reject the values and sexual proclivities displayed.''
Heritage Secretary Virginia Bottomley, who said at the height of the furore that she would like to see local authorities use their powers against unacceptable films, said: ''It is a matter for the official censors. My responsibility is broadcasting.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article