Poyet urges Vicente to return (From The Argus)

sidtheseagull wrote:
Clearly there has been no news today so the Argus newshound has decided to spin the V story yet again....zzzzzzzzzzz

zzzz

dave from bexill wrote:
No comment

Cabin fever wrote:
The job of a reporter is to report the news. This is the latest development involving one of, if not the, most talented players to play for Brighton. An interview with his manager.

I'm assuming you'd prefer this than made up stories?

If there was any news to report, don't you think the paper would run the story?

And if you are really annoyed/bored/offend

ed by another story about Vicente, you could always, I don't know, not click on the link? And then not comment on the story?

Just throwing that out there...

SMF20 wrote:
PLEASE GIVE US A NEW STORY...

gollumgull wrote:
Maybe it was a mistake to give him the impression that the team was being built around him especially when it was not certain that he would re-appear. His past form shows that he is not exactly reliable and he is probably enjoying being the centre of so much attention and feeling that we need him more than he needs us. Surely it is time to stop pandering to his obviously over inflated ego,let him wallow in sunny Spain while we get on and get our squad up and running. Once our amazing Medical Team got him sorted last season he could have walked on water....if he tried it now he would surely sink to the bottom as he has also done in the popularity stakes. Certainly time to move on and enjoy the rain,wind and cold of an English summer and look forward to better weather in the winter and a Seagulls team doing us proud. Ask yourselves two questions: 1)In spite of his ability do we really want him back? 2) If he does re-emerge will we feel the same way about him?

gollumgull wrote:
Maybe it was a mistake to give him the impression that the team was being built around him especially when it was not certain that he would re-appear. His past form shows that he is not exactly reliable and he is probably enjoying being the centre of so much attention and feeling that we need him more than he needs us. Surely it is time to stop pandering to his obviously over inflated ego,let him wallow in sunny Spain while we get on and get our squad up and running. Once our amazing Medical Team got him sorted last season he could have walked on water....if he tried it now he would surely sink to the bottom as he has also done in the popularity stakes. Certainly time to move on and enjoy the rain,wind and cold of an English summer and look forward to better weather in the winter and a Seagulls team doing us proud. Ask yourselves two questions: 1)In spite of his ability do we really want him back? 2) If he does re-emerge will we feel the same way about him?

JoeBlow wrote:

sidtheseagull wrote:
Clearly there has been no news today so the Argus newshound has decided to spin the V story yet again....zzzzzzzzzzz


zzzz

Quit your whining, it's their job. Either grow up a bit or try asking the Argus to refund your subscription fee. Ooohhh.....

gollumgull wrote:
Maybe it was a mistake to give him the impression that the team was being built around him especially when it was not certain that he would re-appear. His past form shows that he is not exactly reliable and he is probably enjoying being the centre of so much attention and feeling that we need him more than he needs us. Surely it is time to stop pandering to his obviously over inflated ego,let him wallow in sunny Spain while we get on and get our squad up and running. Once our amazing Medical Team got him sorted last season he could have walked on water....if he tried it now he would surely sink to the bottom as he has also done in the popularity stakes. Certainly time to move on and enjoy the rain,wind and cold of an English summer and look forward to better weather in the winter and a Seagulls team doing us proud. Ask yourselves two questions: 1)In spite of his ability do we really want him back? 2) If he does re-emerge will we feel the same way about him?

Rhodes Seagull wrote:
This is really becoming very boring Argus, there is a club out there called BRIGHTON and HOVE ALBION
There are Followers/supporters call them what you want reading this same drivel every day now.
Please find some real news< I no it's free on here but for GODS SAKE give the Vicente saga a break, like a two week or forever break. Totally frustrated with the reporting and the situation.

gordongull wrote:
I think we should sign Glenn Murray.

Alfie T wrote:

gordongull wrote:
I think we should sign Glenn Murray.

I agree and sell Barnes, blue touch paper lit...........

JoeBlow wrote:

sidtheseagull wrote:
Clearly there has been no news today so the Argus newshound has decided to spin the V story yet again....zzzzzzzzzzz


zzzz

Quit your whining, it's their job. Either grow up a bit or try asking the Argus to refund your subscription fee. Ooohhh.....

kwaidam wrote:
As good as the dagger is, it would have been dangerous to have built a team around him anyway, given his 'injury' problems... better to have all this now than a month into the season. we don't need to build a team around any single player. we need a team, and everyone playing for each other. so, while we enjoyed what vincente brought to the albion, let's show a bit of respect to the other players in the squad and what they have brought to the club. there is a lot of talent at the albion and if GP can add another couple of experienced players then we will be fine. and, who knows, we may even find a new hero... for me, we already have plenty of them in blue and white stripes already... up the albion... and onwards too.

namgo49 wrote:

JoeBlow wrote:

sidtheseagull wrote:
Clearly there has been no news today so the Argus newshound has decided to spin the V story yet again....zzzzzzzzzzz



zzzz

Quit your whining, it's their job. Either grow up a bit or try asking the Argus to refund your subscription fee. Ooohhh.....

Look the way it works is the paper comes up with a bit of a story and us with no useful life pick up on it and maybe make a pointless comment.

Irrespective of the comment bit, we have then registered as a hit on the site which enables the paper to go to potential advertisers and say X hundred / thousand sad losers out there have hit our web site today and therefore advertising on the site is going to be very productive for you.

Come and pay!

Eesh shimple!

Ricky3 wrote:
The club is moving in the right direction and yet some fans still want glen Murray back???? Are you for real, he left us to join our fiercest rivals and he is nowhere near the standard to take us to the next level. So please get a grip and get over him

kwaidam wrote:
as for glenn murray's celebrations when he scored against us last season??? what celebrations. he just turned to the halfway line and walked back. he behaved a lot better than the fans around me in the north stand who spent the entire match heaping abuse on a player who helped us get up from league one. we need to show more respect all round, chaps.

Ricky3 wrote:
The club is moving in the right direction and yet some fans still want glen Murray back???? Are you for real, he left us to join our fiercest rivals and he is nowhere near the standard to take us to the next level. So please get a grip and get over him

Alfie T wrote:

Ricky3 wrote:
The club is moving in the right direction and yet some fans still want glen Murray back???? Are you for real, he left us to join our fiercest rivals and he is nowhere near the standard to take us to the next level. So please get a grip and get over him

Hey Gordon, I think we've got a bite here, wadda ya think ?

The Phantom wrote:
No idea why posters are continually criticising Brian Owen The Argus. The update on this story is based on an apparently new interview with Gus and it is only right that he should report it. If there is no other decent news stories coming out of the club, then he has to run with this. People would soon moan if there were no updates on this story and in the circumstances it is important the club issue updates. Naylor and Owen are expected to provide lead stories for the paper every day with 99% of them anticipated as being Albion related. If you don't want these stories, don't read the website.

Alfie T wrote:

Ricky3 wrote:
The club is moving in the right direction and yet some fans still want glen Murray back???? Are you for real, he left us to join our fiercest rivals and he is nowhere near the standard to take us to the next level. So please get a grip and get over him

Hey Gordon, I think we've got a bite here, wadda ya think ?

Birdy1975 wrote:

Alfie T wrote:

Ricky3 wrote:
The club is moving in the right direction and yet some fans still want glen Murray back???? Are you for real, he left us to join our fiercest rivals and he is nowhere near the standard to take us to the next level. So please get a grip and get over him

Hey Gordon, I think we've got a bite here, wadda ya think ?

Murray back ? !! What complete morons !! The traitor can rot in hell up at shithurst !!
Sign new talent & stop wasting valuable time on people that do NOT want to play for us !!
Albion are bigger than anyone player !!

Rhodes Seagull wrote:

The Phantom wrote:
No idea why posters are continually criticising Brian Owen The Argus. The update on this story is based on an apparently new interview with Gus and it is only right that he should report it. If there is no other decent news stories coming out of the club, then he has to run with this. People would soon moan if there were no updates on this story and in the circumstances it is important the club issue updates. Naylor and Owen are expected to provide lead stories for the paper every day with 99% of them anticipated as being Albion related. If you don't want these stories, don't read the website.

Quote:- If you don't want these stories!! WHAT stories?
Ah! how about,
"Albion's home game against Leeds United has been chosen by Sky Sports for live broadcast, and as a result has moved forward to a Friday night"

OR

"As part of Albion's ambition to become a Category 2 Academy in accordance with the Elite Player Performance Plan, the club is looking to appoint an Academy Goalkeeping Coach."

Albion In Staffs wrote:
Sorry if this has been said but he was happy to sign a deal with the clause so he's now in breach if he doesn't return. Classic player move to invoke a move. Get rid and move on. If we make a few quid in the process then great. Murray? Do me a favour. We're looking to improve.

The Phantom wrote:

Rhodes Seagull wrote:

The Phantom wrote:
No idea why posters are continually criticising Brian Owen The Argus. The update on this story is based on an apparently new interview with Gus and it is only right that he should report it. If there is no other decent news stories coming out of the club, then he has to run with this. People would soon moan if there were no updates on this story and in the circumstances it is important the club issue updates. Naylor and Owen are expected to provide lead stories for the paper every day with 99% of them anticipated as being Albion related. If you don't want these stories, don't read the website.

Quote:- If you don't want these stories!! WHAT stories?
Ah! how about,
"Albion's home game against Leeds United has been chosen by Sky Sports for live broadcast, and as a result has moved forward to a Friday night"

OR

"As part of Albion's ambition to become a Category 2 Academy in accordance with the Elite Player Performance Plan, the club is looking to appoint an Academy Goalkeeping Coach."

Yes I saw those two news items on the official website.......not sure being live on Sky is really anything to go into lengths of prose about nowadays and as for appointing an Academy goalkeeping coach.....what is the fan most likely to click on, an update including quotes from a new interview on the Vicente story or an article on the clubs intention to appoint an academy goalkeeping coach? If it was the latter, there would probably be no more than a dozen posts on here. People can moan all they want on this one, but the Vicente story continues to be news and probably will for a good while yet.

gordongull wrote:

Albion In Staffs wrote:
Sorry if this has been said but he was happy to sign a deal with the clause so he's now in breach if he doesn't return. Classic player move to invoke a move. Get rid and move on. If we make a few quid in the process then great. Murray? Do me a favour. We're looking to improve.

Do you think goals would help?

Albion In Staffs wrote:

gordongull wrote:

Albion In Staffs wrote:
Sorry if this has been said but he was happy to sign a deal with the clause so he's now in breach if he doesn't return. Classic player move to invoke a move. Get rid and move on. If we make a few quid in the process then great. Murray? Do me a favour. We're looking to improve.

Do you think goals would help?

Not from him. He wouldn't get enough to get us in the top 6.

mark5 wrote:
I would sign Murray in an instant. We have not replaced him and there is no indication we will. He is just the sort of player we need up front in this division, big, strong and with reasonable skill. I have never understood why Gus let him go so easily. Bring him back, irrelevant of the Palace connection!

Alfie T wrote:

mark5 wrote:
I would sign Murray in an instant. We have not replaced him and there is no indication we will. He is just the sort of player we need up front in this division, big, strong and with reasonable skill. I have never understood why Gus let him go so easily. Bring him back, irrelevant of the Palace connection!

Agree totally Mark, quietly delighted that his career at Palace has been less than spectacular, it would have been hard to see him continue the success he had with us. Nobody can deny that without his goals we would not have won the league.

Albion In Staffs wrote:

Alfie T wrote:

mark5 wrote:
I would sign Murray in an instant. We have not replaced him and there is no indication we will. He is just the sort of player we need up front in this division, big, strong and with reasonable skill. I have never understood why Gus let him go so easily. Bring him back, irrelevant of the Palace connection!

Agree totally Mark, quietly delighted that his career at Palace has been less than spectacular, it would have been hard to see him continue the success he had with us. Nobody can deny that without his goals we would not have won the league.

no pace, average technique and we have a chairman and manager with bigger intentions. Forget him he's a backward step and that's got nothing to do with palace. Move on.

Albion In Staffs wrote:

The Phantom wrote:

Rhodes Seagull wrote:

The Phantom wrote:
No idea why posters are continually criticising Brian Owen The Argus. The update on this story is based on an apparently new interview with Gus and it is only right that he should report it. If there is no other decent news stories coming out of the club, then he has to run with this. People would soon moan if there were no updates on this story and in the circumstances it is important the club issue updates. Naylor and Owen are expected to provide lead stories for the paper every day with 99% of them anticipated as being Albion related. If you don't want these stories, don't read the website.

Quote:- If you don't want these stories!! WHAT stories?
Ah! how about,
"Albion's home game against Leeds United has been chosen by Sky Sports for live broadcast, and as a result has moved forward to a Friday night"

OR

"As part of Albion's ambition to become a Category 2 Academy in accordance with the Elite Player Performance Plan, the club is looking to appoint an Academy Goalkeeping Coach."

Yes I saw those two news items on the official website.......not sure being live on Sky is really anything to go into lengths of prose about nowadays and as for appointing an Academy goalkeeping coach.....what is the fan most likely to click on, an update including quotes from a new interview on the Vicente story or an article on the clubs intention to appoint an academy goalkeeping coach? If it was the latter, there would probably be no more than a dozen posts on here. People can moan all they want on this one, but the Vicente story continues to be news and probably will for a good while yet.

oh and yep, agree with this. Have criticised in the past but this is a bona fise story. academy goalkeeping coaches and sky fixtures are not headlines. Vicente is. End of...

kwaidam wrote:
as for glenn murray's celebrations when he scored against us last season??? what celebrations. he just turned to the halfway line and walked back. he behaved a lot better than the fans around me in the north stand who spent the entire match heaping abuse on a player who helped us get up from league one. we need to show more respect all round, chaps.

mark5 wrote:

Albion In Staffs wrote:

Alfie T wrote:

mark5 wrote:
I would sign Murray in an instant. We have not replaced him and there is no indication we will. He is just the sort of player we need up front in this division, big, strong and with reasonable skill. I have never understood why Gus let him go so easily. Bring him back, irrelevant of the Palace connection!

Agree totally Mark, quietly delighted that his career at Palace has been less than spectacular, it would have been hard to see him continue the success he had with us. Nobody can deny that without his goals we would not have won the league.

no pace, average technique and we have a chairman and manager with bigger intentions. Forget him he's a backward step and that's got nothing to do with palace. Move on.

Well I hope that those 'bigger intentions' translate into something solid very soon as with the exception of CMS we have nothing up front as yet which will terrorise Championship defences! In the absence of a quality striker Murray would have done a very credible job at this level. Just look at what we tried last year, Billy Paynter and Sam Vokes. Who would you have, them or Murray? Anyway, as many say, he like a certain other player is in the history books now and I fervently hope that Gus has a decent striker about to swear allegiance to the club!!