TEXT your pictures, videos and messages to 80360. Start your message with SUPIC or email your tip-offs »
3:56pm Friday 4th July 2008
A long-running planning dispute over the demolition of a protected building is on course to be resolved.
Brighton and Hove City Council has recommended the redevelopment of 5-6 Western Road, Hove, be given retrospective planning permission after a three-year fight.
In 2001, owner Mehrvad Nikkah Eshgi was granted permission to convert the former restaurant and gentleman's club, which is in the Brunswick conservation area.
But four years later the structure was virtually demolished and rebuilt as a four-storey building including six flats, ground floor bar and basement nightclub.
Two bids for retrospective planning permission were dismissed by the council after the developer claimed the building had collapsed and had to be reworked for structural reasons.
The last application was rejected in February 2007 and a month later an enforcement notice was issued demanding the building be demolished and the original structure recreated.
Mr Eshgi appealed and although the Government planning inspector found the development was illegal, he dismissed the council's demand for a replica of the old building.
A new planning application was then submitted for retrospective permission and after months of negotiations between officers and the owners, the council's planning committee is being recommended to approve the plan, subject to 26 conditions.
If agreed, the developer will have to remove a controversial ramp in next door Farman Street, replace the unauthorised shop front and change the UPVC windows for timber sliding sash.
Neighbours and ward councillors have fought the unauthorised construction work on site, complaining about the loss of a historic building and the intrusive ramp.
Lib Dem councillor Paul Elgood said that many now believed the proposal was acceptable.
He said: "The scheme that was first submitted was totally unacceptable but the officers have done a good job and are recommending something much better.
"It is not perfect but it is definitely in the right direction and it is now down to detail."
In the report to the planning committee, which will meet next Wednesday, officers say: "The remedial works hereby granted would in their entirety restore an unauthorised building to an acceptable standard having particular regard to the visual amenities of the premises within the Brunswick Town Conservation Area."
Planning agents for the developer were unavailable for comment.
Matthew P, Hove says...
4:49pm Fri 4 Jul 08
Flat Foot Soozie, Brunswick Square says...
6:05pm Fri 4 Jul 08
Jerry Smith, Brunswick Square says...
6:52pm Fri 4 Jul 08
Freddie, Hove says...
7:02pm Fri 4 Jul 08
max, Hove says...
8:00pm Fri 4 Jul 08
pkay, says...
8:51pm Fri 4 Jul 08
perfumepete, on the edge says...
10:01pm Fri 4 Jul 08
quote
thick pauli, hove says...
10:26pm Fri 4 Jul 08
matt, says...
10:50pm Fri 4 Jul 08
thick pauli wrote:The conditions placed on the developer are going to cost him hundreds of thousands and probably bankrupt him.
I have to be honest and admit I do not recognise the development from the address. From the article it seems that the developer has got away almost scot-free. Yet there is much celebration among the comments. Sorry, can someone clarify how the locals have won this. Probably me being a bit thick
caeos, says...
10:51am Sat 5 Jul 08
thick pauli wrote:if you look at
I have to be honest and admit I do not recognise the development from the address. From the article it seems that the developer has got away almost scot-free. Yet there is much celebration among the comments. Sorry, can someone clarify how the locals have won this. Probably me being a bit thick
Eco Man, Kemp Town says...
12:35pm Sat 5 Jul 08
mad green, Hove says...
1:16pm Sat 5 Jul 08
caeos wrote:Thats the mad website which advocates no TV arieals. Very odd indeed.
thick pauli wrote: I have to be honest and admit I do not recognise the development from the address. From the article it seems that the developer has got away almost scot-free. Yet there is much celebration among the comments. Sorry, can someone clarify how the locals have won this. Probably me being a bit thickif you look at eastbrunswick.co.uk then the property is on the front page of the web site along with all the other work that this group does
Big Cheese, Peacehaven says...
8:03pm Sat 5 Jul 08
Add your comment
Register for a FREE The Argus account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.
Please register now or sign in below to continue.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for Jobs in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley and more...
Search Now »
Find the right person in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley...
Search Now »
Search for Homes in Brighton, Worthing, Hove, Lewes...
Search Now »
Search for Cars in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley...
Search Now »
marj, Waterloo Street says...
4:43pm Fri 4 Jul 08
we've all watched this dispute closely and i am glad that the developer has not got away with his distruction of a listed building
how often do we - the residetns - get an outcome like this? never
good work