News RSS Feed


End in sight for Hove planning dispute

3:56pm Friday 4th July 2008

comment Comments (14)   Have your say »

By Lawrence Marzouk, Local Government Correspondent »

A long-running planning dispute over the demolition of a protected building is on course to be resolved.

Brighton and Hove City Council has recommended the redevelopment of 5-6 Western Road, Hove, be given retrospective planning permission after a three-year fight.

In 2001, owner Mehrvad Nikkah Eshgi was granted permission to convert the former restaurant and gentleman's club, which is in the Brunswick conservation area.

But four years later the structure was virtually demolished and rebuilt as a four-storey building including six flats, ground floor bar and basement nightclub.

Two bids for retrospective planning permission were dismissed by the council after the developer claimed the building had collapsed and had to be reworked for structural reasons.

The last application was rejected in February 2007 and a month later an enforcement notice was issued demanding the building be demolished and the original structure recreated.

Mr Eshgi appealed and although the Government planning inspector found the development was illegal, he dismissed the council's demand for a replica of the old building.

A new planning application was then submitted for retrospective permission and after months of negotiations between officers and the owners, the council's planning committee is being recommended to approve the plan, subject to 26 conditions.

If agreed, the developer will have to remove a controversial ramp in next door Farman Street, replace the unauthorised shop front and change the UPVC windows for timber sliding sash.

Neighbours and ward councillors have fought the unauthorised construction work on site, complaining about the loss of a historic building and the intrusive ramp.

Lib Dem councillor Paul Elgood said that many now believed the proposal was acceptable.

He said: "The scheme that was first submitted was totally unacceptable but the officers have done a good job and are recommending something much better.

"It is not perfect but it is definitely in the right direction and it is now down to detail."

In the report to the planning committee, which will meet next Wednesday, officers say: "The remedial works hereby granted would in their entirety restore an unauthorised building to an acceptable standard having particular regard to the visual amenities of the premises within the Brunswick Town Conservation Area."

Planning agents for the developer were unavailable for comment.


Your Say YourArgus

marj, Waterloo Street says...
4:43pm Fri 4 Jul 08

well done guys

we've all watched this dispute closely and i am glad that the developer has not got away with his distruction of a listed building

how often do we - the residetns - get an outcome like this? never

good work

Matthew P, Hove says...
4:49pm Fri 4 Jul 08

Now that is a first, the Council holding a developer to account for their illegal actions.

This site really is a disgrace and I am pleased that progress will be made there to put this crime right.

It'll cost the owner a fortune and I hope it bankrupts them.

Now please can we have action on the other planning abuses in our area - namely 80 Western Road which is equally a disgrace.

Flat Foot Soozie, Brunswick Square says...
6:05pm Fri 4 Jul 08

It's up for sale! Who'll buy into this pack of trouble?

Why didn't Councillor Eelgood do something before now/ This has been going on for ages.

Jerry Smith, Brunswick Square says...
6:52pm Fri 4 Jul 08

I am so glad that the developer of this site has not been allowed to get away with what was a total abuse of the planning system.

This is a victory for local people against the big boy developers.

Well done to all those who kept up the pressure and never gave up. We've been fighting this for two years now.

I'd be interested to know if the develoepr accepts the conditions. I bet he doesn't as restoring the building to this level will cost him hundreds of thousands.

Freddie, Hove says...
7:02pm Fri 4 Jul 08

Well done EBRA and the Councillors for sorting this mess out. This is one for the residents.

Anyone fancy a drink in the pub opposite tonight to celebrate?

max, Hove says...
8:00pm Fri 4 Jul 08

Glad to see the ramp will be removed and a right of way kept open.

pkay, says...
8:51pm Fri 4 Jul 08

The ramp was not just intrusive it was not on the developers land, it was built on a public footpath.
Think I would call it a partial result. pjust

perfumepete, on the edge says...
10:01pm Fri 4 Jul 08

Since when was "Le Cheminee" (the club beneath these premises) a "gentlemen's club"?
quote

thick pauli, hove says...
10:26pm Fri 4 Jul 08

I have to be honest and admit I do not recognise the development from the address. From the article it seems that the developer has got away almost scot-free. Yet there is much celebration among the comments. Sorry, can someone clarify how the locals have won this. Probably me being a bit thick

matt, says...
10:50pm Fri 4 Jul 08

thick pauli wrote:
I have to be honest and admit I do not recognise the development from the address. From the article it seems that the developer has got away almost scot-free. Yet there is much celebration among the comments. Sorry, can someone clarify how the locals have won this. Probably me being a bit thick
The conditions placed on the developer are going to cost him hundreds of thousands and probably bankrupt him.

caeos, says...
10:51am Sat 5 Jul 08

thick pauli wrote:
I have to be honest and admit I do not recognise the development from the address. From the article it seems that the developer has got away almost scot-free. Yet there is much celebration among the comments. Sorry, can someone clarify how the locals have won this. Probably me being a bit thick
if you look at
eastbrunswick.co.uk then the property is on the front page of the web site along with all the other work that this group does

Eco Man, Kemp Town says...
12:35pm Sat 5 Jul 08

Do the residents realise that Elgood has no pull in planning matters as there are no LibDems on the planning committee?

mad green, Hove says...
1:16pm Sat 5 Jul 08

caeos wrote:
thick pauli wrote: I have to be honest and admit I do not recognise the development from the address. From the article it seems that the developer has got away almost scot-free. Yet there is much celebration among the comments. Sorry, can someone clarify how the locals have won this. Probably me being a bit thick
if you look at eastbrunswick.co.uk then the property is on the front page of the web site along with all the other work that this group does
Thats the mad website which advocates no TV arieals. Very odd indeed.

Big Cheese, Peacehaven says...
8:03pm Sat 5 Jul 08

Unless the dodgy egomaniac owner is well loaded, he'll have borrowed money to build what he did (though who lends money for something without planning permission?), and now he'll need money for putting it right - and who's going to lend him that, especially now?

I reckon the place will stay as it is until he can sell it.

And did Building Regulations staff inspect what has happened so far, and why didn't they put a stop to it all?

Way to go with this one.

Your sayYourArgus

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE The Argus account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?

What's On Live Travel YourArgus

Last updated 01.55 with 0 incidents

Full Traffic Report »

Hot Jobs

Local Services


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »