Your Argus RSS Feed


Due defence


I would like to correct Andrew Burnyeat’s assertion (Letters, March 10) that the University of Sussex students who were suspended following an occupation protest on campus “will not get a chance to defend themselves in any kind of hearing”.

These students will be going through the university’s student disciplinary processes, which include the right to a hearing and representation in front of a duly constituted panel. Some actions may need to await the outcome of current police investigations.

Suspension and exclusion have been used in this case as a precautionary measure to prevent further disruptive occupations. The students can of course make representations on the decision. But this is not a punishment or a final judgment on the actions of these individuals.

The University is of course mindful of the academic circumstances of individual students involved. The specific terms of their suspension and exclusion are being reviewed and will be adjusted to allow them to participate in academic activities and fulfil their academic requirements, while the disciplinary processes are carried through.

Professor Paul Layzell, Deputy Vice-Chancellor, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton

Comments(1)

a75 says...
7:05pm Sat 13 Mar 10

This is highly misleading. These students were suspended and excluded without a hearing. They were only offered a hearing after widespread outrage at such suspensions without a trial. They have been reinstated after the management realised they had shot themselves in the foot. They are allowed to attend their courses but have still been banned from political activities. Sussex is renowned for its liberal history. This Professor and his colleagues seem bent on ending this liberalism.


Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses