Your Argus RSS Feed


The poor should not have to pay bankers' gambling debts

Nothing could illustrate better the meanness, hypocrisy and class bias of the present Government, 18 of whose members are millionaires, than abolishing child trust funds and free school meals for half a million poor children.

David Cameron and Nick Clegg are targeting the weakest and poorest members of society to get back the £1tn of our money which was foolishly given to the bankers by Gordon Brown – which together with the illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is the main cause of the public deficit. It needs to be emphasised that it is not the public sector which has caused the deficit but the irresponsible activities of the bankers and speculators of the private sector.

Having squandered billions on “sub-prime” (in other words, dodgy) mortgages, the banks realised the bets were based on worthless toxic assets and that they were in fact bankrupt. So Gordon Brown and New Labour bailed them out, transferring their private debts to the public sector.

Overwhelmed by gratitude and no doubt amazed at New Labour’s stupidity, they proceed to pay themselves multi-million bonuses which they then invest so as to pay as little tax as possible.

Why should the general public suffer because of the irresponsible gambling of financiers who have turned the global economy into a vast casino? Instead of cutting the jobs of hard-working public sector workers in health, education and welfare, we should nationalise the banks and financial services industry completely and send those responsible for the global economic crisis to prison.

Ten years’ hard labour would be a fitting punishment.

Fred Shipton
Donald Hall Road, Brighton

Comments(3)

yorkie44 says...
6:41pm Thu 17 Jun 10

The problem is really quite simple, since we gave up trading goods and rely on money the banks are essential to our economy and therefore they have to be supported. The government is at fault for not regulating the banks as well as the senior managers of the banks who did not understand what their staff were doing. Since the government has no money and the banks have to be supported the tax payer has to cough up. If we refuse things will only get worse.

RottingdeanRant says...
6:45pm Thu 17 Jun 10

We as a country have been spending more than we should so we have to cut back and make our budget balance. That means that we should cut all spending and just get on with it. People should be responsible for themselves and not expect others to support them. Therefore if you want children you have to pay for them.

Andy R says...
9:41am Mon 21 Jun 10

RottingdeanRant wrote:
We as a country have been spending more than we should so we have to cut back and make our budget balance. That means that we should cut all spending and just get on with it. People should be responsible for themselves and not expect others to support them. Therefore if you want children you have to pay for them.
This crass argument never ceases to amaze me. How do you expect to get through your life without the support of other people's children?

It's other people's children who will one day serve you in shops, clear away your rubbish, treat you when you're sick and feed you and help you to the toilet when you can't do those things for yourself any more.

And this country has NOT been spending "more than it should". There's plenty of money sloshing round the 4th richest country in the world - it's just in the wrong hands.

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree