The psychiatrist, Tim Ojo, writes in Body and Soul "the new Mental Health Act seeks to under-gird the potential of both compulsory riskreducing in-patient and communitybased treatment ostensibly in order to allay public concerns" (The Argus, November 12).
What on earth does any of that mean?
Fortunately the good doctor explains that "one of the most significant consequences of these tensions is the move from a rolebased delivery model to a task-based delivery model".
That's all right then. But I'm still not sure if I want any doctor messing with my under-gird.
- Mary Marsden, Preston Park Avenue, Brighton
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article