Feminism and college pathways:
I have explored whether there is any correlation between sixteen to eighteen-year-olds' college pathways and where they stand on the feminist perspective scale. Importantly, these results only acknowledge the college pathway, not any personal factors, the data is not a reliable way to assume students' beliefs. The test taken was the Feminist Perspectives Test (Historical) found on IDRlabs. 

 Students studying creative Alevels: 
Conservative feminism- 
Mean: 21%
Range: 33%

Liberal feminism-
Mean: 84%
Range: 8%

Radical feminism- 
Mean: 60.5%
Range: 55%

Socialist feminism- 
Mean: 62.5%
Range: 15%

Cultural feminism- 
Mean: 45%
Range: 20%

Women of colour feminism- 
Mean: 74%
Range: 12%

Overall mean (aside from conservative/non-feminist): 65.2%
Overall range: 22%

Students who study creative Alevels were shown to have the largest and most united support for liberal feminism and the lowest for conservative feminism- their opinions were the most divided over radical feminism.

Students studying STEM Alevels:
Conservative feminism- 
Mean: 29.4%
Range: 40%

Liberal feminism- 
Mean: 71%
Range: 30%

Radical feminism- 
Mean: 67.2%
Range: 52%

Socialist feminism- 
Mean: 60.8%
Range: 70%

Cultural feminism- 
Mean: 57.2%
Range: 37%

Women of Colour feminism- 
Mean: 69.8%
Range: 38%

Overall mean (aside from conservative/non-feminist): 65.2%
Overall range: 45.4%

STEM students were the most significantly divided over socialist feminism, and were the most united over liberal feminism, whilst supporting it the most too. Conservative feminism was supported the least. 

Students studying humanities Alevels:
Conservative feminism- 
Mean: 8%
Range: 20%

Liberal feminism- 
Mean: 74.9%
Range: 35%

Radical feminism- 
Mean: 74.9%
Range: 47%

Socialist feminism- 
Mean: 61.7%
Range: 40%

Cultural feminism- 
Mean: 54.7%
Range: 40%

Women of colour feminism- 
Mean: 81.1%
Range: 40%

Overall mean (aside from conservative/non-feminist): 69.5%
Overall range: 40.4%

Those studying humanities were the most united over conservative feminism, and the most divided over radical feminism. Meanwhile, women of colour feminism was the most supported, and conservative the least.

Students studying social science Alevels:
Conservative feminism- 
Mean: 14%
Range: 33%

Liberal feminism- 
Mean: 76.3%
Range: 45%

Radical feminism- 
Mean: 74.7%
Range: 47%

Socialist feminism- 
Mean: 58%
Range: 50%

Cultural feminism- 
Mean: 57.7%
Range: 35%

Women of colour feminism- 
Mean: 80.1%
Range: 33%

Overall mean (aside from conservative/non-feminist): 69.4%
Overall range: 42%

Social science students showed the most support for women of colour feminism and the least for conservative feminism, and they were equally the most united over conservative and women of colour feminism and the most conflicted over socialist feminism.

Students studying alternative level three qualifications:
Conservative feminism- 
Mean: 30.6%
Range: 45%

Liberal feminism- 
Mean: 67.6%
Range: 35%

Radical feminism- 
Mean: 61.6%
Range: 68%

Socialist feminism- 
Mean: 59.2%
Range: 45%

Cultural feminism- 
Mean: 60.4%
Range: 45%

Women of colour feminism-  
Mean: 61.2%
Range: 22%

Overall mean (aside from conservative/non-feminist): 62%
Overall range: 43%

Those studying alternate level three qualifications supported liberal feminism the most and conservative feminism the least, they were the most united over women of colour feminism and the most divided over radical feminism.

All students were unanimously against conservative feminism, but the similarities largely end there. The highest-scoring feminist group was the humanities students with an average of 69.5%, the lowest was (just about) the group studying alternative level three qualifications, although this was by point five percentage points. STEM students appear to have the most divided opinions and the creative students the least. The least feminist/most conservative group was also the alternative pathway group. The overall ranges and means make the results seem deceptively similar, once we take a closer look at the individual scores and ranges the data becomes much more complex-it is difficult to make generalisations. A prime example of this is the seemingly low mean scores for conservative feminism, as when we consider the mean with the range it becomes clear that the line of thinking is not linear for some of the groups.

As with everything in life there are outliers, this study is intended to pique interest and prompt deeper levels of thought into how different aspects of individuals impact their wider worldviews, rather than to create stereotypes and generalisations.