Manassas, Tuesday
A WOMAN who cut off her husband's penis with a kitchen knife saw his
body as an ''instrument of torture'', a psychiatrist told a Virginia
court today.
She said Lorena Bobbitt was a battered wife and not in control of her
actions when she attacked husband John Wayne Bobbitt last June.
Dr Susan Feister, an expert witness for the defence, said that Mrs
Bobbitt was a typical battered woman who had been repeatedly beaten,
raped, and verbally abused.
''Under the experience of these overwhelming emotions she attacked the
weapon which was the instrument of her torture -- that is her husband's
penis,'' the psychiatrist said.
''I don't believe she had control over her actions at that time.''
Mrs Bobbitt, a 24-year-old manicurist born in Ecuador, is charged with
malicious wounding. If convicted she could be jailed for 20 years.
The psychiatrist, called to back the defence claim that Mrs Bobbitt
acted in a moment of temporary insanity, said: ''She had an acute
deterioration of the mental state and became psychotic.''
She went on: ''She suffered from major depressive disorder, she
suffered from post traumatic stress disorder and she suffered from an
anxiety disorder.''
On Friday Mrs Bobbittt tearfully described the night of the attack,
claiming she had been raped by her 26-year-old husband after he came
home from a night of drinking.
She remembered grabbing a kitchen knife but said she did not actually
remember cutting off his penis.
Although she later told police what had happened Dr Feister said that
she had ''reconstructed'' the events only after discovering the severed
penis in her hand as she fled in her car.
Mrs Bobbitt has told how she threw it out of the car window when she
realised she still had it. Police later found it and it was reattached
by doctors.
Bobbitt was acquitted of marital rape two months ago in the same court
and has denied he ever struck his wife.--Reuter.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article