- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@brightonargus
All the latest news and view from the Argus
@theargusoffers
The latest offers and competitions from the Argus
@theargusguide
The best events in Brighton, Hove and Sussex
@ArgusMagazine
Features, interviews, TV, travel and lifestyle from the Argus
- Find us on Facebook
The Argus
The Argus - news, sport and leisure for Brighton, Hove and Sussex
The Argus Offers and Competitions
Keep up to date with all the offers, events and competitions from the Argus
Cliff footpath row steps up a gear (From The Argus)
Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
Brighton to Peacehaven cliff footpath row steps up a gear
10:20am Monday 17th December 2012 in News By Ben James
Ramblers at the former footpath on the cliff tops between Brighton and Peacehaven – Picture by Ian Parsons
Ramblers are threatening legal action against a water company which they say has unlawfully blocked a public footpath.
Members of Sussex Ramblers claim that Southern Water has fenced off a section of the Brighton to Peacehaven cliff path for its Portobello pumping station works without the required permission.
Chris Smith, from the group, said: “We accepted that the work had to be done, but it has now been finished for a while.
“We were patient because we were under the impression that they had obtained the relevant approval.
“However, after some digging around by David Brookshaw of the South Downs Society, it became clear that they hadn’t.”
The matter dates back some 20 years, when the previous water company set about constructing the pumping station.
Keep out signs were erected and, despite heavy opposition, the construction went ahead.
In recent years ramblers, East Sussex County Council, which is responsible for keeping the path, and the water company have attempted to come to a compromise.
Footbridge suggestion
Mr Smith added: “We have tried to speak to them whenever we can and have suggested the option of reinstating the footpath in the form of a footbridge.
“We are in this for the long run though.
“We have taken legal advice and have made sure we have sufficient funding to take this all the way.
“If Southern Water went and dug up the coast road and then left it, there would be uproar. But because it’s a footpath, they think they can get away with it.”
The group notified Southern Water three weeks ago of their intention to take legal action, but are yet to receive a response.
Cliff excavation
A company spokeswoman said: “We are committed to resolving this longstanding matter and are continuing our discussions with East Sussex County Council.
“The footpath cannot be reinstated along the original alignment, as a section of it is in mid-air due to the essential cliff excavation work carried out by the water authority in the early 1970s.
“This excavation took place when the present Portobello works were constructed, which was prior to Southern Water taking over the operation of this site.
“We will continue our discussions with the county council to secure a resolution.”
See the latest news headlines from The Argus:
- Cyclists flout pavement ban just days after police crackdown on Brighton seafront
- Brighton and Hove City Council urged to let blue badge holders park for free
- Chichester speeders targeted in Sussex Police operation
- Union announces further strike action after negotiation talks crumble
- Looking back: Budgie not just a pretty boy then!
Add us to your circles on Google+
Comments(6)
Old Ale Man
says...
12:57pm Mon 17 Dec 12
getThisCoalitionOut
says...
1:22pm Mon 17 Dec 12
Crystal Ball
says...
3:07pm Mon 17 Dec 12
whereisthe...?
says...
7:59am Tue 18 Dec 12
Do people really not mind being treated like ants by such companies...?
whereisthe...?
says...
8:02am Tue 18 Dec 12
Oh, that would be 'cos the Tory councillors are in the pocket of Southern water, and since this is a Tory paper.... You can figure out the rest....!
mustaphaLeeko says...
12:23pm Mon 17 Dec 12
Is it a case of bloody mindedness given that they are only walking past the front of a water treatment works anyway?
Don't see the problem myself, I'd be quite happy with a small detour personally.