10% of NHS budget going to private firms

One pound in every £10 spent by the NHS on healthcare in Sussex is going to private companies.

Figures obtained by The Argus under the Freedom of Information Act reveal more than £267m was paid out in one year to private firms to treat NHS patients.

Treatments include abortions, routine hip and knee replacement operations, cataract surgery, treatment for digestive problems and MRI scans.

Campaign groups and unions say the figure is likely to rise as a result of the controversial shake-up of the NHS, which means more services are likely to be contracted out.

They warn patients will be affected, with companies focusing more on profit than healthcare.
The money can range from large contracts such as running walk-in centres to smaller payments to local private hospitals to carry out minor operations and cut down on waiting lists.

The money spent is 10% of the £2.7bn used on healthcare services by NHS Sussex between April 2011 and March 2012.

Brighton and Hove spent £61m, East Sussex Downs and Weald £66.5m, West Sussex £125m and Hastings and Rother £14m.

In the autumn it emerged that hearing aid services currently provided by Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust have been put out to tender and are to be provided by a private company.

Virgin Care took over the running of some physiotherapy sessions at local clinics and GP surgeries in the Hastings and Rother areas in September.

They had previously been run by East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust. However a reversal of fortunes led to the Sussex Othopaedic Treatment Centre in Haywards Heath coming back under NHS control last year.

The centre, which carries out routine hip and knee replacement operations, had been run by private companies since it opened in 2007.

During this time it was criticised in a review by a Government watchdog when inspectors raised concerns about some operating theatre procedures and decontamination methods.

However improvements have been made since then. The Brighton and Sussex hospitals trust took over the contract in April.

Paul Evans from the Brighton- based NHS Support Federation lobby group, said: “We are seeing a vast expansion in the private sector providing treatments to NHS patients.

“Government changes mean there are now huge profits to be made. The impact upon the NHS will be damaging as it will lose out on vital funding when cuts are already creating huge pressure.

“We have already seen evidence of corner-cutting from private companies, causing delays and poorer quality care for patients. Patients trust the NHS because it put their needs first. We must avoid an NHS led by the market and controlled by big business.”

Tony Reynolds of the Central Sussex Patients Forum said: “If using a private provider means a patient has their scan, or operation or any other treatment more quickly, then that can only be something to welcome.

“However it is something that needs to be watched carefully.

“A private provider is a company that needs to cover costs and make money and that should never get in the way of patient care.”

A spokesman for NHS Sussex said: “We are committed to ensuring that our patients receive safe and effective health services, and that they can receive them in a timely way where and when they need treatment.

“Occasionally this can be in the form of working with non NHS providers, however in these cases the services are still NHS services and are free for patients.”

Comments(7)

Morpheus says...
9:45am Wed 2 Jan 13

It is time to stop the discussion of NHS versus private care and put the patients and patient choice first. The arguments here are just ideological and nothing to do with health. Private care here is really contracted out care and is not the same as true private care where the patient is in control of everything.

bruce_ says...
12:09pm Wed 2 Jan 13

The NHS has long used some private providers; however, if private firms can make "huge profits", why can public services not provide the care that is needed, thus in principle saving money? I fear we shall see more and more cases of patient care being first taken away from the NHS, which we know is not perfect, then, after poor performance from its replacement, being given back. And what will all this cost? It is surely much cheaper and more satisfactory in the long run for failing hospitals and other facilities to be officially supervised until they improve, rather than to farm the work out, in the expectation that others -- often one's business idols, when not actually indirect associates -- will be able to do better.

But, there: just as we all blame immigrants, we all want "savings", even when they are only apparent and temporary -- in which case, no doubt, we will have a convenient lapse of memory, and pretend, indeed believe, that we had nothing to do with the scandal...

seasidejohn2 says...
1:22pm Wed 2 Jan 13

It's all to do with choice, I chose to have my knee replacement op in a private hospital because the consultant had been recommended by people I knew.

The treatment was exemplary, the care was first class and the meals were cooked on site and were of a very high standard.

seasidejohn2 says...
1:22pm Wed 2 Jan 13

It's all to do with choice, I chose to have my knee replacement op in a private hospital because the consultant had been recommended by people I knew.

The treatment was exemplary, the care was first class and the meals were cooked on site and were of a very high standard.

getThisCoalitionOut says...
9:22pm Wed 2 Jan 13

The reason so many NHS places are being replaced with private healthcare ones is because David Cameron and many of his disgraceful associates have "interests" in private healthcare companies - read this from "social investigations. blogspot. co. uk re mps with finacial links -

http://socialinvesti
gations.blogspot.co.
uk/p/mps-with-or-had
-financial-links-to.
html

Plantpot says...
9:22am Thu 3 Jan 13

I couldn't care less who provides the treatment as long as it is of the right quality and provides value for money.

Plantpot says...
9:26am Thu 3 Jan 13

getThisCoalitionOut wrote:
The reason so many NHS places are being replaced with private healthcare ones is because David Cameron and many of his disgraceful associates have "interests" in private healthcare companies - read this from "social investigations. blogspot. co. uk re mps with finacial links -

http://socialinvesti

gations.blogspot.co.

uk/p/mps-with-or-had

-financial-links-to.

html
On the other hand, Labour politicians are financed almost exclusively by the Unions, whose membership continues to decline. What's your point? All politicians seem to have vested interests.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree