- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@brightonargus
All the latest news and view from the Argus
@theargusoffers
The latest offers and competitions from the Argus
@theargusguide
The best events in Brighton, Hove and Sussex
@ArgusMagazine
Features, interviews, TV, travel and lifestyle from the Argus
- Find us on Facebook
The Argus
The Argus - news, sport and leisure for Brighton, Hove and Sussex
The Argus Offers and Competitions
Keep up to date with all the offers, events and competitions from the Argus
Excess road signs removed in Brighton (From The Argus)
Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
Excess road signs removed in Brighton
4:20pm Monday 14th January 2013 in News By Kimberly Middleton, Acting chief reporter
Lewes Road before the signs were removed
A council is stripping roadsides of dozens of unnecessary traffic signs every year.
Brighton and Hove City Council removed around 130 signs, bollards and other items from Lewes Road as part of improvement works last year and are expecting a similar haul when improvement works are carried out around Brighton Station later this year.
The council also removed about 100 signs from the London Road area in 2011 during a project to improve the area.
Removed signs are recycled where possible or disposed of in an environmentally friendly method. If sold, the money is then used to bolster the city’s traffic budgets.
Earlier this month, the Department for Transport urged councils to do more to remove unnecessary signs “blotting the landscape of towns and cities”.
The chair of the council’s transport committee, Ian Davey, said: “We’re in favour of removing what our traffic experts regard as excess signage and road clutter.
“We do not have any specific targets for this, but we make a habit of factoring it into our roads and traffic improvement projects.”
See the latest news headlines from The Argus:
- Union announces further strike action after negotiation talks crumble
- Looking back: Budgie not just a pretty boy then!
- Union’s anger at frontline care plans in West Sussex
- Huge shingle moving operation to improve coastal defence in Shoreham and Lancing
- Sussex anti-frackers in tea party protest
Add us to your circles on Google+
Comments(19)
taman
says...
4:35pm Mon 14 Jan 13
Fairfax Sakes
says...
4:50pm Mon 14 Jan 13
Mr Sworld
says...
5:01pm Mon 14 Jan 13
O_o
nosolution
says...
5:15pm Mon 14 Jan 13
bug eye
says...
5:22pm Mon 14 Jan 13
upsidedowntuctuc
says...
5:34pm Mon 14 Jan 13
How hard up are they to need to melt down old traffic signs and now the railings at the dials
He wont be popular taking away places to chain your bike up!
sedwardsESQ
says...
5:42pm Mon 14 Jan 13
Dealing with idiots wrote:Enforceable maybe not but there are those of us whom used sense when driving along any of these roads these 20 MPH's appear and much before these sign's ever appeared, these signs are in urgent need unlike reminders of how enforceable they are, as they are not just there has a gimmick.
To only be replaced by lots of 20mph signs which are not enforceable.
sedwardsESQ
says...
5:55pm Mon 14 Jan 13
bug eye wrote:Yes too many dammed traffic lights, which causes an issue on omissions , this is definitely an issue for the Greenness at City Council, all these unessential fumes and hold ups, I'd bet it is a deliberate action via the Greenness to deliberative detestable the traffic flow through the whole city, so in order to eventually be able to say it's good grounds and cause to ban all vehicles from the City as part of their Greenness Plan.
what about the excessive traffic light systems popping up everywhere, not to mention more lines, parking machines and painted road surfaces, bus and cycle lanes. finally do we need streetlight lamposts every 20 yards, along the seafront there are a total of 8 streetlights every 20 yards or so. its all madness and just a scramble to see what the council can waste our money on whilst raising council tax and cutting services.
Big Fido
says...
6:03pm Mon 14 Jan 13
sedwardsESQ
says...
6:03pm Mon 14 Jan 13
sedwardsESQ wrote:Typo : should read, ***deliberately destabilize***
bug eye wrote:Yes too many dammed traffic lights, which causes an issue on omissions , this is definitely an issue for the Greenness at City Council, all these unessential fumes and hold ups, I'd bet it is a deliberate action via the Greenness to deliberative detestable the traffic flow through the whole city, so in order to eventually be able to say it's good grounds and cause to ban all vehicles from the City as part of their Greenness Plan.
what about the excessive traffic light systems popping up everywhere, not to mention more lines, parking machines and painted road surfaces, bus and cycle lanes. finally do we need streetlight lamposts every 20 yards, along the seafront there are a total of 8 streetlights every 20 yards or so. its all madness and just a scramble to see what the council can waste our money on whilst raising council tax and cutting services.
Trojandog
says...
6:21pm Mon 14 Jan 13
There we are. Sorted out a major Brighton traffic problem in 2 minutes. Pity the highways department have never been able to figure it out!
Dealing with idiots
says...
6:29pm Mon 14 Jan 13
sedwardsESQ wrote:On side roads a good idea, but Ian and his idiots have imposed this across the city apart from the seafront where all the drunk hen/ stag parties cross. Possibly some kind of green culling process for the terminally stupid?
Dealing with idiots wrote: To only be replaced by lots of 20mph signs which are not enforceable.Enforceable maybe not but there are those of us whom used sense when driving along any of these roads these 20 MPH's appear and much before these sign's ever appeared, these signs are in urgent need unlike reminders of how enforceable they are, as they are not just there has a gimmick.
sedwardsESQ
says...
6:30pm Mon 14 Jan 13
Big Fido wrote:I don't see any one bashing anyone, what I see is folk debating signs, if it happens to be the Greenness that is rulers to our Council then surly that should be acceptable as in their training for being in public eye, right!
Where else but here could an article about the council removing unnecessary road signs be turned into a reason to bash the Greens!
David Cameron get's what you called "bashed" every second of the day but do you see him whimpering behind closet doors or complaining, anyway you just another KitKat Patsy and isn't worth debating.
sedwardsESQ
says...
6:39pm Mon 14 Jan 13
Fairfax Sakes wrote:Fairfax It's nice some times to be able to break the law without caution and something I must admit myself, I once parked in a spot with big sign saying "strictly no parking" reason being not able to find suitable parking spot and probably a bit of frustration, was in hove and there was tons of traffic wardens kept passing me, they smiled some said hello but none said I couldn't park there, in fact I nipped to the shop and they never gave me a ticket either but it was the adrenaline rush of feeling you broke a rule and of cause knowing it never caused an obstruction, did you chuckle after! :-)
I once walked past a sign which said "No loitering". So I stopped and jolly well loitered.
sedwardsESQ
says...
6:46pm Mon 14 Jan 13
upsidedowntuctuc wrote:Never chain bikes to these posts, I've seen kid's lift the bike and lock over the pole after knocking plate off, railings the same they usually pre loosened before bikes are chained, a wee twist up and off into big white van, thought Brighton installed bike racks all over the City or are they now the dustbins?
Davey probably thinks that it's Lewes Road but it is actually Surrey Street heading north by the Station.
How hard up are they to need to melt down old traffic signs and now the railings at the dials
He wont be popular taking away places to chain your bike up!
Wooton Basset
says...
12:25am Tue 15 Jan 13
‘One Planet Living’ programme.
its a "little town called Brighton " not Monaco or Luxembourg.
the law has no meaning if the will of the people is ignored
AmboGuy
says...
10:07am Tue 15 Jan 13
sedwardsESQ wrote:Your grammar is terrible. Just thought I'd bring this to your attention.
upsidedowntuctuc wrote:Never chain bikes to these posts, I've seen kid's lift the bike and lock over the pole after knocking plate off, railings the same they usually pre loosened before bikes are chained, a wee twist up and off into big white van, thought Brighton installed bike racks all over the City or are they now the dustbins?
Davey probably thinks that it's Lewes Road but it is actually Surrey Street heading north by the Station.
How hard up are they to need to melt down old traffic signs and now the railings at the dials
He wont be popular taking away places to chain your bike up!
sedwardsESQ
says...
8:37pm Tue 15 Jan 13
AmboGuy wrote:To be honest Amboguy I couldn't give a toads **** what you think of any ones grammar, if you that well educated what you doing wasting your miserable educated life on a blog? just a place to pass your miserable life picking holes in folks grammar and typos puts you definitely in the class of the like-minded and to be honest unless you don't have anything that's really constructive to say I suggest you instead keep your educated silver spoon life to yourself and stop trolling those who wish to share knowledge, something unfortunately you lack.
sedwardsESQ wrote:Your grammar is terrible. Just thought I'd bring this to your attention.
upsidedowntuctuc wrote:Never chain bikes to these posts, I've seen kid's lift the bike and lock over the pole after knocking plate off, railings the same they usually pre loosened before bikes are chained, a wee twist up and off into big white van, thought Brighton installed bike racks all over the City or are they now the dustbins?
Davey probably thinks that it's Lewes Road but it is actually Surrey Street heading north by the Station.
How hard up are they to need to melt down old traffic signs and now the railings at the dials
He wont be popular taking away places to chain your bike up!
Dealing with idiots says...
4:27pm Mon 14 Jan 13