MP calls for alternative Brighton mainline route - the Arundel Chord

Nick Herbert

Nick Herbert

First published in News

MP Nick Herbert has made a renewed call for Network Rail to install an alternative route for passengers on the Brighton mainline after widespread flooding caused travel chaos this week.

The plea comes as bosses at the rail company confirmed they would consider the MP's proposal for a diversion onto the Arun Valley line whenever the Brighton mainline is temporarily closed.

Thousands of passengers were left delayed for hours at Brighton station on Monday after heavy rain caused groundwater flooding at Patcham, bringing the mainline to a near standstill in some areas.

The Conservative MP for Arundel and South Downs said the “Arundel Chord” would provide a direct link between Horsham and Worthing on the southbound Arun Valley line if the Brighton mainline was closed.

He said: “Adding a tiny section of railway below Arundel to enable trains from Brighton or Worthing to turn north onto the Arun Valley line would enable services to run from Brighton to London in the event of problems or maintenance on the overstretched Brighton line.

“Monday's flooding, which meant that thousands of commuters were unable to go to work, was a timely reminder of why the Arundel Chord could prove a good investment.”

Network Rail had originally dismissed the idea of the new route claiming that while it was used as a diversion it would add at least 50 minutes to travel times in normal circumstances and no-one would want to run services on it.

In a letter to the MP last year Tim Robinson, Network Rail's managing director on the Sussex route, added that the diversion would mean trains rejoining the mainline would not be able to call at Crawley, Gatwick and Croydon, which he claims are all important stops on the mainline route.

But Network Rail spokesman Chris Denham said the company is now including the line in its new route study, which is due out later this year, to consider if it could be used at times of disruption.

Adam Love, Sussex route public affairs manager at Network rail said it was too early to identify potential stations or stopping patterns on the potential line.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:35am Thu 20 Feb 14

Mart says...

It's really very hard to argue against the economic case for not adding a very small piece of track to enable north turns onto the Arun line from Brighton & Worthing, but no doubt the bone-idle unionised dinosaurs who run the trains and track in the UK will find a thousand reasons not to do so, in the same way that they cancel entire services, or run them late, at the drop of a hat.
It's really very hard to argue against the economic case for not adding a very small piece of track to enable north turns onto the Arun line from Brighton & Worthing, but no doubt the bone-idle unionised dinosaurs who run the trains and track in the UK will find a thousand reasons not to do so, in the same way that they cancel entire services, or run them late, at the drop of a hat. Mart
  • Score: 3

1:03pm Thu 20 Feb 14

wicket5 says...

If the current services that use the Arun valley line join the main line at Three Bridges and serve Three Bridges, Gatwick and East Croydon why not those diverted from Brighton, is this just an excuse not to add the chord at Arundel
If the current services that use the Arun valley line join the main line at Three Bridges and serve Three Bridges, Gatwick and East Croydon why not those diverted from Brighton, is this just an excuse not to add the chord at Arundel wicket5
  • Score: 2

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree