The ArgusGay and bisexual blood donors ban ‘should be lifted’ (From The Argus)

Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.

Gay and bisexual blood donors ban ‘should be lifted’

The Argus: Gay and bisexual blood donors ban ‘should be lifted’ Gay and bisexual blood donors ban ‘should be lifted’

A “DISCRIMINATORY” ban which stops some gay and bisexual men giving blood should be lifted, councillors say.

Green councillors on Brighton and Hove City Council say existing restrictions mean potential life-savers are being turned away.

A lifetime ban on gay and bisexual men giving blood was lifted in most of the UK in 2011.

However any man who has had sex with another man within the last year is still not allowed to donate.

Experts say it now takes three months for tests to show whether someone is infected with HIV and other serious blood-borne infections and six months for Hepatitis C.

A motion is being tabled at the next city council meeting in July asking for the city to call on the Government to change the rules.

Proposer and city councillor Alexandra Phillips said the 2011 change was welcome but did not go far enough.

She said: “The current rules are still discriminatory and are not backed by analysis of risk.

“Good science would support a six-month window before donating blood after a possible risk, for all donors, on the basis that tests for HIV and Hepatitis C can detect infection within that time.

“The health service desperately needs safe blood donations, but this discrimination bars perfectly healthy men from helping to save lives.

 “It is possible to have a safe donor system based on the prevention of harm yet which does not discriminate.”

Fellow councillor Mike Jones, an NHS sexual health adviser, said: “It’s absolutely crucial that blood supplies are safe and there should be proper measures in place to deal with risky individuals.

“But these rules mean in practice the vast majority of healthy gay and bisexual men are prevented from donating.

“The result is we cut the supply of safe blood to the NHS while high-risk heterosexual donors remain free to donate.

“Given that only around 5% of healthy people actually donate blood, rather than discriminating against large sections of the population, it would be far better and fairer to treat donors on a case-by-case basis using precise questions so that those gay and bisexual men who are willing to give blood would answer questions that accurately identify their degree of risk.”

The Department of Health’s advisory committee on the safety of blood, tissue and organs partly justifies the ban because of the higher number of cases of hepatitis B in gay and bisexual men than the rest of the population.

Campaigners say this could be addressed by a targeted vaccination programme.

Comments (6)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

6:19am Tue 17 Jun 14

Tr1stan says...

After hearing about programs such as "What happens in Sunny beach" and the vile "Geordie Shore" it looks to me like a lot of heterosexual people engage in EXTREMELY risky behaviour too. SImilarly I know plenty of gay couples who live in monogamous relationships and would love to give blood...
After hearing about programs such as "What happens in Sunny beach" and the vile "Geordie Shore" it looks to me like a lot of heterosexual people engage in EXTREMELY risky behaviour too. SImilarly I know plenty of gay couples who live in monogamous relationships and would love to give blood... Tr1stan
  • Score: 9

6:40am Tue 17 Jun 14

Tr1stan says...

After hearing about shows like "What happens in Sunny Beach" and the vile "Geordie Shore" it seems to me like a lot of heterosexual people engage in extremely risky behaviour too! Similarly, I know many gay couples who are in monogamous relationships who want to give blood but can't...
After hearing about shows like "What happens in Sunny Beach" and the vile "Geordie Shore" it seems to me like a lot of heterosexual people engage in extremely risky behaviour too! Similarly, I know many gay couples who are in monogamous relationships who want to give blood but can't... Tr1stan
  • Score: 6

9:24am Tue 17 Jun 14

PorkyChopper says...

NO. Why take the risk? For what? To prove a point?
NO. Why take the risk? For what? To prove a point? PorkyChopper
  • Score: -9

9:45am Tue 17 Jun 14

ThinkBrighton says...

HIV, NO THANKS. Keep the ban, better safe than sorry!
HIV, NO THANKS. Keep the ban, better safe than sorry! ThinkBrighton
  • Score: -4

1:17am Wed 18 Jun 14

thevoiceoftruth says...

PorkyChopper wrote:
NO. Why take the risk? For what? To prove a point?
Not to prove a point but because there is shortage of blood donors. Heterosexuals can give blood freely even though they could be HIV positive and all blood is tested anyway.
[quote][p][bold]PorkyChopper[/bold] wrote: NO. Why take the risk? For what? To prove a point?[/p][/quote]Not to prove a point but because there is shortage of blood donors. Heterosexuals can give blood freely even though they could be HIV positive and all blood is tested anyway. thevoiceoftruth
  • Score: 2

4:47am Wed 25 Jun 14

Tr1stan says...

thevoiceoftruth wrote:
PorkyChopper wrote:
NO. Why take the risk? For what? To prove a point?
Not to prove a point but because there is shortage of blood donors. Heterosexuals can give blood freely even though they could be HIV positive and all blood is tested anyway.
A voice of reason! Thanks thevoiceoftruth! :-) Some people completely miss the point @choppyporkpork no one is trying to "prove a point" and if ThinkBrighotn thinks they are safer receiving only straight people's blood the poor thing is sadly mistaken! Poor thing!
[quote][p][bold]thevoiceoftruth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]PorkyChopper[/bold] wrote: NO. Why take the risk? For what? To prove a point?[/p][/quote]Not to prove a point but because there is shortage of blood donors. Heterosexuals can give blood freely even though they could be HIV positive and all blood is tested anyway.[/p][/quote]A voice of reason! Thanks thevoiceoftruth! :-) Some people completely miss the point @choppyporkpork no one is trying to "prove a point" and if ThinkBrighotn thinks they are safer receiving only straight people's blood the poor thing is sadly mistaken! Poor thing! Tr1stan
  • Score: 3

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree