News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Tesco wins fight to sell drink in Kemp Town

Supermarket giant Tesco has won its legal battle to sell alcohol at its new store.

Councillors had ordered the company to keep drink off the shelves when it opens its new Tesco Express in St James's Street, Brighton, in June.

But their decision was overturned yesterday after magistrates said the multinational could not be blamed for the problems in the area.

The ruling was met with disappointment by local residents, traders and councillors who opposed the licensing application.

Tesco’s application was turned down in November by Brighton and Hove City Council's licensing panel on the grounds that it could add to the negative impact alcohol already had in the area.

At the appeal hearing magistrates were told that alcohol-fuelled disorder had made life a misery for people living and working in the area.

They were told there were fears that if the supermarket was allowed to sell cheap drink the problems would escalate.

Brighton and Hove City Council and Sussex Police, which opposed the application, made the area a cumulative impact zone because of its problems, which means it receives special attention when licences are considered.

But magistrate Juliet Smith said: "There is no evidence to show that the overall sales of alcohol in the area would increase if we were to grant Tesco Stores Ltd a licence."

Instead the court granted Tesco a licence subject to 12 conditions, which include alcohol only being sold between noon and 10pm, a security guard being on duty at all times that alcohol is on sale and no beer and cider for sale with an alcohol content of more than 5.5%.

Carol Theobald, the chairman of the council's licensing committee, said: “We are disappointed that our decision was overruled as we felt that there were not good enough reasons for licensing another premises in the area.

“We will continue to judge every case on its merits, taking into account the views of residents, the police, and other businesses in the locality."

Rachel Fryer, a councillor for the Queen's Park ward, said: "We are really disappointed in the outcome. It is as simple as this – if alcohol is cheaper people will drink more and problems will increase.

“We will be looking carefully at the impact once the store opens."

Resident Trevor Scoble, who spoke against the application at the appeal hearing, said: "This decision is very wrong. I cannot lead a normal life because there is so much drinking in the streets."

Inspector Andrew Kundert, of Sussex Police, said: "We obviously respect the decision of the court and we appreciate the very strict conditions that the magistrates have placed upon Tesco.

“We will ensure the conditions are monitored."

Comments(19)

dstocken says...
9:50am Wed 29 Apr 09

I have a vast experience on this subject and I can assure you that the crime rate in the immediate area will undoubtebly go up, due to this poor decision. this is not an isolated case, anywhere that a new "Off-sales" licence is issued, you can check the crime records, you will find that promoting irresponsible alcohol sales, as this "Magistrate" has effectively done, leads to more pub closures and more people drinking in the street. These "magistrates" should be removing off-licenses, not issueing them!

davyboy says...
10:04am Wed 29 Apr 09

this is a brave decision, as there are already too many outlets for alcohol in this area. as long as tesco are EXTREMELY tough on the production of i.d's, then maybe it will be ok, but having said that, i think it would have been difficult not to allow it either. as a multi-national company, tesco would have a strong case for an appeal had this not been allowed, as many other place, ie somerfield, already sell booze.

kkj says...
10:04am Wed 29 Apr 09

I'm a local resident and I'm not disapointed by the decision at all. I would hope and expect that Tesco would be more careful, and its staff better trained, than the small independent retailers, many of who seem not to care who they sell alcohol too.

On the subject of street drinking, wasn't street drinking outlawed several years ago in this area? Has this been repealed? If not, then can our local police start enforcing it. If it has, then it ought not to have been.

dstocken, I disgree that granting this licence promotes irresponsible alcohol sales; read the article again taking note of the conditions imposed by the magistartes. Then walk along St. James's Street, taking note of all the other premises where alcohol is on sale without any of these conditions attached.

Pee-Jay says...
10:18am Wed 29 Apr 09

The problem is with the Police. They do not LIKE touching these drunks. Every time these pepole are picked up by the Police they they should be droped on the edge of Town and made to walk back in, keep doing this to them and they will soon go some were else.

The other Offliccenes should be patroled more and there Licesence taken away if they serve the drunks. If they cant get the drink they will not stay.

davyboy says...
10:30am Wed 29 Apr 09

having re-read the article, i think that subjecting this licence to conditions is a good idea, but why not put these conditions on ALL licences in this area. why just one company? that, to me, sounds like restrictive practice against tesco. if the council want restrictions on alcohol sales, then these should affect all retailers. cheap, high alcohol content, beer and cider is available elsewhere, and if thats what people want, then they will travel to get it.

Robert Mugabe says...
10:54am Wed 29 Apr 09

Pee-Jay wrote:
The problem is with the Police. They do not LIKE touching these drunks. Every time these pepole are picked up by the Police they they should be droped on the edge of Town and made to walk back in, keep doing this to them and they will soon go some were else. The other Offliccenes should be patroled more and there Licesence taken away if they serve the drunks. If they cant get the drink they will not stay.
You always get one that blames the police, its always the fault of the police. Its got nothing to do with the Govt or society as a whole , its the fault of the police.

This is a problem we are all stuck with, one that will not go away. Booze is to easy to get hold of these days. You have 24hr shops open all over the place selling cheap drink. If the pi--heads cant buy booze they wont be able to get drunk. Blame the council for letting so many places open up, not the police.
And before i get flamed i am not a copper. Just put the blame at the feet of the real culprits.

censored says...
10:55am Wed 29 Apr 09

I assume I'll be granted a licence for a mini mart and offie on St James Street now? And anyone else who wants one?

Hell, let's just grant every business a licence to sell booze. The magistrates have clearly stated now that the number of licences premises in an area has nothing to do with the problems around them.

mark 62 says...
11:39am Wed 29 Apr 09

to be honest the problem is with drunks in this area, if they cant buy it from tesco they will buy it some where else, the small shops seem to only have the drunks as customers, hopefully tesco will put these people out of the area, and tesco refuse entry to the scum who ruin the lives of everyone in the area.

Dizd says...
1:30pm Wed 29 Apr 09

I don't really think you can make a bad situation here. There are so many places in St Jim's Street where alcohol can be purchased, including all the cheap bars. If they can't get it here they can go elsewhere. It never ceases to amaze me as to how far someone's benefits can stretch. A stroll up there at any time of day/night you always see people drunk!

Junglist Massive says...
2:03pm Wed 29 Apr 09

St James' Street? Must be Starbucks' fault...

sussex2 says...
3:38pm Wed 29 Apr 09

'Dizd, Brighton says...
1:30pm Wed 29 Apr 09
I don't really think you can make a bad situation here. There are so many places in St Jim's Street where alcohol can be purchased, including all the cheap bars. If they can't get it here they can go elsewhere. It never ceases to amaze me as to how far someone's benefits can stretch. A stroll up there at any time of day/night you always see people drunk!I don't really think you can make a bad situation here. There are so many places in St Jim's Street where alcohol can be purchased, including all the cheap bars. If they can't get it here they can go elsewhere. It never ceases to amaze me as to how far someone's benefits can stretch. A stroll up there at any time of day/night you always see people drunk!'

You stroll up St James st! That's brave. A good steady trot and one hand firmly on your wallet is my advice..



Brightonscouse says...
6:22pm Wed 29 Apr 09

Why arn't there restrictions on the amount of licenced premises in an area like the government are planning to do with fast food outlets.
There's already a supermarket numerous small shops an off licence and the Co Op at the top of St James' St where alcohol can be bought not to mention the verious bars and restaraunts.
The street itself is a small shopping centre and has a high concentration of alcohol selling premises.

Issac Hunt says...
6:31am Thu 30 Apr 09

What a fuss about nothing. Do these moaners really believe that because Tesco may (or may not) sell some types of alcohol a few pence cheaper than another store, all the drunks are going to come out of the woodwork and buy more??? Utter Rubbish. They will buy it at one of the many other shops if Tesco wasnt selling it. Tesco will if anything, will have a good effect on the area the same as a big name like Starbucks does. Tesco and Starbucks want to offer a higher than average user experience, so will make the others raise their standards in order to compete. Tesco and Starbucks openning in St Jameses St are the best thing thats happened for years.

Osama bin there says...
8:50am Thu 30 Apr 09

In the St James Street area, you don't have to walk more than a few yards to find somewhere you can buy alcohol. In fact that's pretty much true of the whole of Brighton.
I can't see that granting Tesco a licence will make the slightest bit of difference to the average street drinking scum.
The ban on street drinking needs to be enforced with ZERO tolerance and on the spot fines.
That's the only way you will clean up central Brighton.
It's got nothing to with Tesco.

dstocken says...
2:51pm Thu 30 Apr 09

Quote; "Tesco's have the morality of a crack dealer" MP, house of commons, last week.
I agree with the above statement and also with Osama, (above) Zero Tolerance on street drinking would cure this problem overnight, the next problem is that the booze is far too cheap and totally irresponsibly marketed by small shops(including tesco's and sainsbury's etc)
you can see proof of this by going back 10-15 years.
another problem is that publicans used to police most of these drunkards, in their pubs(a very unrewarding task, i can assure you)but now that the "PC brigade" and the local authorities have closed virtually all local pubs, the drunks are obviously going to increase in numbers and more money will have to be poured into the NHS to support this "Street-Binge-drinki
ng" culture, that magistrates have created.

King from Hove says...
6:34pm Thu 30 Apr 09

Only Zero tolerance will cut out street drinkers who are seen everyday from London Rd to Kemp town and the seafront to Hove.The Police turn a blind eye as it is just too much hassle.

horace morris says...
8:02pm Thu 30 Apr 09

Pee-Jay wrote:
The problem is with the Police. They do not LIKE touching these drunks. Every time these pepole are picked up by the Police they they should be droped on the edge of Town and made to walk back in, keep doing this to them and they will soon go some were else. The other Offliccenes should be patroled more and there Licesence taken away if they serve the drunks. If they cant get the drink they will not stay.
Sorry Pee Jay, that never worked with John Rambo, and look what he did to that town!

paulbton says...
12:03pm Mon 4 May 09

I have my own ideas on alcohol problems, 1. anyone arrested for drunk and disorderly or antisocial behaviour due to drink, should be band from going out for a month a curfew. 2. anybody needing treatment from our emergence services because of drink, shouldn't get it free. And 3. a local alcohol tax, this would be a tax on alcohol sales of say 10p, so a round of drinks would have a 10p add tax one pint would have the same a meal out with wine would have the 10p and drink from shops the same you get my meaning. All this tax money would go to the local police , so out of town people and holiday makers that come to Brighton and get drunk would be paying for the police not just us.

dstocken says...
8:29pm Sat 9 May 09

paulbton wrote:
I have my own ideas on alcohol problems, 1. anyone arrested for drunk and disorderly or antisocial behaviour due to drink, should be band from going out for a month a curfew. 2. anybody needing treatment from our emergence services because of drink, shouldn't get it free. And 3. a local alcohol tax, this would be a tax on alcohol sales of say 10p, so a round of drinks would have a 10p add tax one pint would have the same a meal out with wine would have the 10p and drink from shops the same you get my meaning. All this tax money would go to the local police , so out of town people and holiday makers that come to Brighton and get drunk would be paying for the police not just us.
Well said! I was in "A & E" this week, around midnight, the drunkards there were not from pubs, they had got drunk at home and in the streets, it's about time people astarted blaming our half-witted magistrates and licencing police, the police should vigourously object to the issueing of any new "off-sales license" if they don't want the job, then they should let someone with more guts do it! I volunteer! NO MORE OFF-LICENSES TO BE GRANTED !

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree