Mike Stimpson (Opinion, November 8) advocates the provision of affordable
housing by government subsidy, suggesting that existing subsidies paid to housing associations are sufficient to enable them to compete in the open market.
In fact, the grant paid by government towards the cost of social housing is fixed annually. At the same time rents are fixed for the year at affordable levels, well below those of market rents.
Clearly in times of inflations in the property market ,this fixed regime prevents housing associations from being competitive and the only way to enable the satisfactory supply of land is to work through the planning system.
The only alternative would be an open-ended subsidy and/or a housing benefit system, which successive governments have been unwilling to contemplate, or a return to the
general development land tax regimes which were so unpopular in the past.
-David Wilkinson, Chair, Brighton & Hove Housing Partnership
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article