Potentially deadly dust particles could threaten the health of people living near Shoreham Harbour.

A council has urged that the air in and around Shoreham Harbour should be closely monitored in a bid to reduce the risk. A report to Adur District Council's community services and environment committee tomorrow outlines the potential risk from airborne pollution.

It concentrates on the presence of microscopic particles, called PM10s, which are so small they are able to penetrate deep into the lungs. Department of Health figures show PM10s are responsible for 8,100 premature deaths a year and 10,550 respiratory hospital admissions.

Chief environmental officer Peter Latham said the council has been working with West Sussex County Council to establish PM10 levels in the area. He says there is growing concern nationally that PM10s may originate from aggregate and bulk handling processes, which have traditionally been associated with ports.

Sources of PM10 and dust identified in the Shoreham and Southwick area include natural sea salt and dust from the seashore and beaches. Industrial and commercial sources include a concrete batching plant, sea-dredged aggregate, handling of bulky cargoes and a mineral processing plant.

Pollution from diesel and petrol vehicles and exhaust from ships are also highlighted. Mr Latham said in his report the Shoreham Maritime study on the port's redevelopment could have a far reaching impact on the local environment.

He said: "A comprehensive environmental assessment is required. Part of this study should include a survey of dust and PM10."

Mr Latham said councillors should consider earmarking money for a full study in 2001/2002. The report was greeted with alarm by people living near Shoreham Harbour.

Ann Jermy, of Park Way, Southwick, said: "There are quite a few people in the area who suffer from asthma and who are convinced that it is caused by dust from the harbour." The mother-of-one, who campaigned against an incinerator being built at the harbour, said she and other campaigners welcomed the possibility of a pollution study.

Converted for the new archive on 30 June 2000. Some images and formatting may have been lost in the conversion.