Brighton and Hove Albion's chief executive told a public inquiry Falmer was still the best place to build a stadium.

Martin Perry yesterday told the hearing his conclusion remained exactly the same as in 1999 - that Falmer was the best available option with the least environmental impact.

The inquiry at Brighton Town Hall heard evidence from Mr Perry a 22,000-seat arena at Falmer would be able to take full advantage of the area's public transport links.

He said: "Falmer is well served by public transport which provides an alternative and attractive means of getting to the site, which by its very nature and location severely restricts travel by car.

"Reduction of the number of cars brings with it environmental benefits more than can be achieved at other sites."

Mr Perry told the inquiry acquisition of the site was a realistic proposition as its three owners - Brighton and Hove City Council, Brighton University and Sussex University - had been in negotiations with the club for a long time.

Another major advantage of Falmer outlined in Mr Perry's evidence was the site's proximity to the two universities and Falmer School. All three would be able to use the stadium.

He said: "Falmer is the only site for a new stadium for the community, including a permanent home for Brighton and Hove Albion Football Club."

Eleven sites are under consideration at the inquiry. These are Falmer, Withdean, Waterhall, Toad's Hole Valley, Coral greyhound stadium, Shoreham harbour, Shoreham airport, New Monk's Farm, Upper Beeding Cement Works, Sheepcote Valley and Brighton station.

Lewes District Council opposes the development of a stadium at Falmer. This is because the applications for this site conflict with planning policies protecting the character of the Sussex Downs area of outstanding natural beauty and the new South Downs National Park.

Lewes District Council also believes development of the site would close an important gap of open countryside between the Brighton urban area and Falmer village.