As noted in the article but, sadly, not in the headline ("Charity's vet backs hunt ban", The Argus, January 7), Bill Swann no longer works for the RSPCA.

So, any views expressed by him are personal ones and not representative of the RSPCA's considered stance on the Hunting Bill

We agree with Mr Swann that hunting with dogs is cruel and should be prevented but do not share his optimism that the proposed tribunal system would ensure the majority of fox hunting would end.

The only way to ensure this is to amend the Bill to specifically prohibit it, which is why we are urging MPs to do exactly that.

The RSPCA feels strongly this issue is a matter for elected MPs to decide upon, not an appointed registrar or tribunal.

MPs have been presented with all the evidence on cruelty and utility and should be allowed to reach a position on whether fox hunting should be banned or not.

It is the RSPCA's view the Hunting Bill as it stands will be an expensive bureaucratic nightmare.

Finally, I correct a small point. Bill Swann is not a former RSPCA chief vet. He was assistant chief veterinary officer with principal responsibility for RSPCA hospitals.

-Jackie Ballard, Director General, RSPCA