Our popular Eye In The Sky supplements have brought more comment, this time from Roger Collins of Burgess Hill.

He that spotted a couple of pictures had been printed in reverse, as mentioned in previous columns.

However, his real gripe is with some of the captions. For example, there was no location for Rudyard Kipling's house in Burwash and the description of East Sussex National Golf Course as "north of Eastbourne" would have been better saying "north-west" or, better still, "near Uckfield".

The caption for a picture of Seaford mentioned the Martello tower on the seafront but the tower wasn't in the picture and neither was much of the seafront.

In the Mid Sussex supplement, a picture showed where Mr Collins used to live but he couldn't work it out and the caption made no reference to the area involved (I wonder how he recognised it then?).

"I could cite many other examples," says Mr Collins. "As I suspect there was no time constraint on the series, may I suggest that more care and time should have been taken?"

Mrs Gray, from Hastings, says she bought The Argus specially to see if her house was in it. And so it was - sort of.

She explains: "There was a picture of the pier and above that there was a building site with the first five houses under construction (one of which is ours).

"The picture must have been taken in the early summer of 1999 as we moved in December 1999. The development (on the site of the former Royal East Sussex Hospital) was completed in August 2001.

"Perhaps we can look forward to a future Eye In The Sky when we may see our completed home!"

The final comment on the subject is from last week's complainant Dorothy Hobden, from Eastbourne, who adds: "I forgot to say my husband had pointed out the Long Man of Wilmington is actually house bricks painted white and is not cut out of chalk. Volunteers paint it from time to time to keep it white."

Tony Gunn, membership secretary of the Hove branch of the Royal British Legion, was "appalled" at the coverage we gave to last Sunday's Hove Memorial Parade last compared with that of the Remembrance service in Brighton.

He explains: "Ten lines and a very poorly-printed picture, despite the fact that we had the mayor, Ivor Caplin MP and various other dignitaries present. I was under the impression we lived in the City of Brighton AND Hove."

Sorry, Mr Gunn, we should have devoted more space to Hove and probably another picture, although the quality of them was not that good, due to the poor weather.

Apologies, too, to Linsey Behan for describing her as Brian Behan's first daughter instead of his third in our report of his funeral Saturday's paper and for misquoting her as saying: "No matter how crazy he was, he was a character and a one-off." That was said by someone else there.

Linsey is good enough to add, however: "The tone of the report was sympathetic and I am sure Brian would have appreciated the publicity."

Our story on Wednesday last week about the home-made memorial to Sarah Payne on the A29 Pulborough stated the tributes had been removed for a second time by West Sussex County Council when it should have said they would be removed because they were a road hazard. Sorry.

Finally, to another Spicer (courtesy of Gerald Spicer, from Portslade) who says our Lotto and Lotto Extra numbers in Thursday and Friday's paper said they were from Wednesday, November 7, when, in fact, last Wednesday was November 6. The numbers were right, though.