I'm pleased to see there is a lively debate now about alternative energy.
But heat pumps get very little mention. This is a pity, because: 1 They are a first-class long-term money-saving investment for the average householder who has even a small garden.
2 They act like a fridge in reverse they take heat out of the ground, all year round, and pump it into a house. A simple, low-maintenance, low-tech but very efficient system.
3 Every kilowatt to run it gives 3-4kw of heat, winter and summer.
4 In Norway, 90 per cent of new houses are fitted with heat pumps.
5 Payback times are now seven to eight years but, as prices rise, this will come down and the expected Goverment grant scheme will also reduce payback times.
6 The energy to run it can come from any source, including renewables.
7 In summer, some systems offer cooling in place of heating.
8 This is well proven, simple technology. There are no large, expensive bits to go wrong. So heat pumps seem a very good bet in an uncertain world.
Why, then, are they so little known? Is it, perhaps, because, unlike nuclear power, there is no large, well-funded lobby.
We could have a national, Government-supported heat pump installation programme, which would be a very sound energy investment whatever happens to oil prices.
Our kids would thank us for it. Brighton could lead the way. So, how about it?
-Geoff Beuret, Brighton
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article