News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Brighton and Hove council boss criticises licensing powers

Licensing law is “stacked against councils and residents”, officials in Brighton and Hove say.

Despite high levels of alcohol-related hospital admissions in the city, there are 1,378 licensed premises in Brighton and Hove, 142 of which can open 24 hours a day.

City council leader Mary Mears yesterday slammed the “binge-drinking” culture and vowed to support proposed changes to licensing law.

The comments come as figures show nearly 90% of applications for new premises in Brighton and Hove's cumulative impact zone - the area designed to control the number of licensed premises in the city - have been approved in the last two years.

Coun Mears said she backed the raft of proposals put forward by Home Secretary Theresa May.

These include banning retailers from selling drinks at below cost price and allowing councils to charge pubs and clubs an extra fee if they want to stay open late.

Comments(10)

Dave At Home says...
9:23pm Wed 13 Oct 10

But the Council granted the licences, didn't they? Well who is to blame them....?

bladebot says...
9:52pm Wed 13 Oct 10

Charging an extra fee to stay open late is moot, the pubs and clubs will simply pass that cost on to us...

pyallop says...
11:05pm Wed 13 Oct 10

Well said Mary Mears. I will be joining her in supporting changes to this legislation. Councils have been virtually powerless to implement the wishes of local residents since the rules were relaxed.

Paul Yallop - Leader of Worthing Borough Council

ade1200 says...
11:06pm Wed 13 Oct 10

bladebot wrote:
Charging an extra fee to stay open late is moot, the pubs and clubs will simply pass that cost on to us...
Well thats OK then surely? If customers don't wish to pay then they will go home - so the establishment will revert to normal hours if it is not profitable. If customers do wish to pay then the council receives some recompense for the extra costs associated. Lets hope they intend to pass some of the money received to the ambulance service and hospitals...

hoveflyer says...
12:03am Thu 14 Oct 10

so why is the x snipe,carden avenue, soon to be sainburys local,going be selling drink from 7 till 11??? oh mary, please dont insult us! and they trying to get that plot at preston park. christ, this council wake up and smell the over priced coffee!!

oldmarket says...
9:52am Thu 14 Oct 10

The point is that the law relaxed opening hours and licensing restrictions and councils can't reject applications as they once did.

That's the point Mary Mears is making.

Mr Bluesky says...
10:34am Thu 14 Oct 10

Dave At Home wrote:
But the Council granted the licences, didn't they? Well who is to blame them....?
They had to grant the licenses. The new licensing laws Labour brought in were so lax and poorly worded it is almost impossible for the Council or residents to object - look at the number of sleazy lapdancing clubs that have opened in the last decade.

That said I hope she doesn't try to go too far and try to take us back to 'every pub closes at 11pm', because frankly that would be awful for the tourism trade we rely upon so much.

TheInsider says...
1:38pm Thu 14 Oct 10

And this is why pub landlords find themselves falling foul of environmental health noise laws when they are granted a licence not realising there are a raft of other laws which come into play despite a licence being issued.
We wouldn't have the controversy over the Freebutt closing and other pubs being fined for noise if councils did not give certain pubs in residential areas extended opening hours in the first place.
Issuing licences gives businesses and their clients the message that they have permission to operated as a 'venue'. The pub goers and landlords think the licence means their business is fully accepted, only to leave punters disappointed and upset when the other laws (such as noise and anti-social behaviour etc) are used to prevent their business working come into play.
It's like giving someone a present and then saying they can't open it.

jay316 says...
1:54pm Thu 14 Oct 10

@Dave At Home: you are correct the council grant the licences.. Did they just grant one for a Lloyds (witherspoons) in North Street.. Outside their own rules, that there was already to many venue in that part of town.

Hard times says...
6:28pm Thu 14 Oct 10

I would argue the complete opposite.

All it takes to shut down part of the heart of the city in today's Brighton, is for people to move into a council house next door to an existing venue and complain.

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree