Worthing man arrested for defacing Rothko masterpiece

A man who claimed responsibility for writing on a Mark Rothko painting at London's Tate Modern gallery has been arrested on suspicion of causing criminal damage.

Vladimir Umanets, 26, was arrested in Worthing last night by Sussex Police on behalf of officers from Scotland Yard.

He was held at a Sussex Police station before being transferred to the capital for questioning hours after explaining his actions.

A man was seen to daub on the Rothko mural on Sunday afternoon before fleeing the gallery.

Yesterday Umanets said he was responsible for writing on the painting.

The wording on the bottom-right corner of the piece appears to read: "Vladimir Umanets, A Potential Piece of Yellowism."

Sources last night confirmed Umanets, originally from Russia, was the arrested man.

Umanets said he was not a vandal: "Some people think I'm crazy or a vandal, but my intention was not to destroy or decrease the value, or to go crazy. I am not a vandal."

Umanets, who studied art, is one of the founders of "Yellowism", which he describes as "neither art, nor anti-art".

"Yellowism is not art, and Yellowish isn't anti-art. It's an element of contemporary visual culture. It's not an artistic movement.

"It's not art, it's not reality, it's just Yellowism. It can't be presented in a gallery of art, it can be presented only in Yellowistic chambers.

"The main difference between Yellowism and art is that in art you have got freedom of interpretation, in Yellowism you don't have freedom of interpretation. Everything is about Yellowism - that's it.

"I am a Yellowist. I believe what I am doing and I want people to start talking about this. It was like a platform.

"I don't need to be famous, I don't want money, I don't want fame, I'm not seeking attention.

"Maybe I would like to point people's attention on what it's all about. What is Yellowism? What is art?

"It's good people are shocked about what happened. No one is realising what actually happened, everyone is just posting that the piece has been damaged or destroyed or defaced.

"But I believe that after a few years they will start looking for it from the right angle. So that's why I did it."

Umanets added: "I believe that from everything bad there's always a good outcome so I'm prepared for that but obviously I don't want to spend a few months, even a few weeks, in jail.

"But I do strongly believe in what I am doing, I have dedicated my life to this."

He said he did not plan which painting he would write on, but thinks he found "the perfect choice", and said he feels he may have increased the value.

"To be honest, I do believe I increased the value. It seems probably ridiculous for someone but I do believe in this. I didn't decrease the value, I didn't destroy this picture, I put something new."

The Tate Modern was shut for a short period then reopened after the incident at 3.25pm on Sunday.

The gallery said it does not have a price for the defaced piece, but paintings by the Russian-born artist often fetch tens of millions of pounds.

A spokeswoman said: "There was an incident at Tate Modern in which a visitor defaced one of Rothko's Seagram murals by applying a small area of black paint with a brush to the painting.

"The police are currently investigating the incident."

Eyewitness Tim Wright posted on Twitter: "This guy calmly walked up, took out a marker pen and tagged it. Surreal.

"We gave a description to the gallery. Very bizarre, he sat there for a while then just went for it and made a quick exit."

A picture he uploaded to the social networking website showed five or six words scrawled on the bottom-right corner of the piece, with black streaks of paint running down from the daubed writing.

Earlier this year, Rothko's Orange, Red, Yellow sold for £53.8 million - the highest price paid for a piece of post-war art at auction.

The 1961 painting went under the hammer at Christie's in New York.

Comments(10)

pwlr1966 says...
7:58am Tue 9 Oct 12

What an oddball, deport him before he goes crazy!!!

F in L says...
8:14am Tue 9 Oct 12

Sussex Police arrest a man ...well, he did leave his name in large letters on the painting then released a statement to the Press admitting it on Monday, so I suppose it was a difficult collar.

Morpheus says...
9:00am Tue 9 Oct 12

Another immigrant enriching our culture. We should have more of them. Anybody heard of Greenism? Another crazy idea.

graham_Seagull says...
9:33am Tue 9 Oct 12

Morpheus wrote:
Another immigrant enriching our culture. We should have more of them. Anybody heard of Greenism? Another crazy idea.
I can trump you there; Greenism hasn't brought about the most severe econonmic depression ever seen....historially Unrestrained Capitalism has been proved to be far more damaging!!

kkj says...
9:49am Tue 9 Oct 12

'Rothko masterpiece'? Seriously?

PaulOckenden says...
10:33am Tue 9 Oct 12

His vandalism is more interesting and has more artistic merit than the original painting. Probably took longer, too.

Atticus says...
12:21pm Tue 9 Oct 12

kkj wrote:
'Rothko masterpiece'? Seriously?
Seriously. It hangs in the Tate.

It's actually quite amazing when you see it in person.

Crystal Ball says...
12:29pm Tue 9 Oct 12

kkj wrote:
'Rothko masterpiece'? Seriously?
Philistine.

Hooitness says...
12:59pm Tue 9 Oct 12

Crystal Ball wrote:
kkj wrote: 'Rothko masterpiece'? Seriously?
Philistine.
Caravaggio, Seurat, Michaelangelo, Singer Sergreant, you know, real artists created masterpieces.

Comparing Rothko to them lumps you firmly in the "Rah rah darling, I simply must have a Rothko to hang in the kitchen so everyone knows how pretentious I am" camp.

Sorry, but as an illustrator I loathe fine art. They wake up around noon, daub a black square on a canvas and call it art.

An illustrator gets up at dawn, agonises over their initial sketches, develops the idea over days, and then creates the final work.

Rothko woke up at noon, daubed a black square on a canvas, and dumb **** paid him for it.

F in L says...
5:32pm Tue 9 Oct 12

Hooitness wrote:
Crystal Ball wrote:
kkj wrote: 'Rothko masterpiece'? Seriously?
Philistine.
Caravaggio, Seurat, Michaelangelo, Singer Sergreant, you know, real artists created masterpieces.

Comparing Rothko to them lumps you firmly in the "Rah rah darling, I simply must have a Rothko to hang in the kitchen so everyone knows how pretentious I am" camp.

Sorry, but as an illustrator I loathe fine art. They wake up around noon, daub a black square on a canvas and call it art.

An illustrator gets up at dawn, agonises over their initial sketches, develops the idea over days, and then creates the final work.

Rothko woke up at noon, daubed a black square on a canvas, and dumb **** paid him for it.
A painter gets up, measures his line, mixes the paint, prepares the surface and then paints the yellow lines. You are a complete berk.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree