"

MHubbs wrote:
The plain truth is that we have been fed a whole load of chicken feed on this story. His injury is non specific as are his whereabouts for the last four months, as is his progress, or lack of. Like many, I am sure, I doubt that his absence has been due to injury at all? This, his inclusion is academic to the team IMO. His desire to play is not evident and so to lay any hope of his lifting the team to new heights is both unfounded and unwarranted as far as I can see. If he does return, great, but lets not get ahead of ourselves. We have heard all this before. We have other more reading needs in the team than our so called play makers return!

'His injury has been non-specific,' really?
'His whereabouts for the last four months have not been specific, really?
You doubt that he has really been injured, really?
'His inclusion back into the team is academic,really?
'Any hope of him lifting the team is unfounded, really?




,"