Your Argus RSS Feed


‘We’re being careful with every penny,’ says Green councillor

How quick the Conservative and Labour councillors are to criticise, yet it is both their parties who argue the devastating budget cuts being imposed on us are necessary.

Greens disagree and we are campaigning hard to change national policies which will harm the poorest and most vulnerable residents of our city. We face a 33% cut in the council’s formula grant over four years.

Conservatives are being disingenuous in claiming they had no plans for a 2.5% council tax increase. On February 17 the Conservative adminis- tration’s cabinet voted for a Medium Term Financial Strategy which included a 2.5% council tax increase for the next three financial years.

Will Jan Young and Coun Ann Norman withdraw their statements to the contrary?

Let’s be clear, the discussion currently under way is about the next council budget for the financial year 2012/13. It is highly misleading to suggest the underspend from the last financial year (2010/11) – which in their dying days Conservatives had already programmed into the current year’s budget (2011/12) – should have anything to do with the next year (2012/13).

It will be up to all councillors to vote on what the next budget will be, including council tax.

We understand the challenge everyone’s finances are facing. We are being careful with every penny.

The proposed 3.5% increase is below inflation and will cost a Band D taxpayer 85p more a week compared with this year’s tax rate. Meanwhile, the council needs to reduce its spend by up to 15% in the next two years.

Our whole budget approach will be to face that challenge in the most open, inclusive and sensitive way possible.

I encourage all readers of The Argus to participate in the consultation process when it starts later this year.

Coun Jason Kitcat, Green Cabinet member for Finance and Central Services, Brighton and Hove City Council

Comments(7)

graham_Seagull says...
11:12am Wed 27 Jul 11

A very refreshingly open statement from a council...now that doesnt happen that often!

bug eye says...
12:29pm Wed 27 Jul 11

what the greens need to remember is that they need to look after all residents, council tax paying voters too, if the bills are to go up then we expect better roads, better pavements, 21st century planning policies etc. etc. and not to forget to drop this stupid ugly council re branding logo, and give us back our iconic identity.

Charismatic Andrew says...
1:22pm Wed 27 Jul 11

bug eye wrote:
what the greens need to remember is that they need to look after all residents, council tax paying voters too, if the bills are to go up then we expect better roads, better pavements, 21st century planning policies etc. etc. and not to forget to drop this stupid ugly council re branding logo, and give us back our iconic identity.
If you want better roads and better pavements (which I'm sure we all do), don't expect it to be paid for by this Council Tax increase. As Kitcat quite rightly says the increase is below inflation and is at a time when the grant from Central Government is being slashed. If you want better roads and pavements you'll need to respond to the consultation and tell the Council where else they should be making savings. And no, dropping the Council rebranding isn't going to pay for better roads and pavements.

quedula says...
1:51pm Wed 27 Jul 11

graham_Seagull wrote:
A very refreshingly open statement from a council...now that doesnt happen that often!
It is a good statement, untainted with party dogma, and one feels able to believe every word of it. Not something one experiences often with politicians.

Morpheus says...
5:00pm Wed 27 Jul 11

Can anybody explain why, if the expenditure is being reduced by 15%, we have to pay more council tax?

Warren Morgan says...
6:20pm Wed 27 Jul 11

It's the Conservative-led Government which is imposing a 33% cut in funding - £83 million - on Brighton & Hove over the next three years. Government funding makes up about 80% of the city council's overall budget, council tax about 20%. So the huge cuts from the Government will have to be met by either cutting services, or putting council tax up or a combination of both. This is way beyond what "efficiency savings" can deliver, even if there hadn't been efficiency savings made over the past decade.

I welcome Jason's invitation to an open budget setting discussion - a real improvement on the previous administration. However he criticizes the Labour & Co-operative Group for suggesting cuts are unavoidable. The Greens campaigned ahead of the local elections on "resisting all cuts as far as is practicable", but the reality is that without a change of government these cuts are coming, whatever Caroline Lucas says or the Green-led council does.

The Greens are not in a position to cancel Trident or pull out of Afghanistan or tax the bankers more, let alone divert that money to local government. So anyone who voted Green under the impression that the Greens would stop the cuts happening was misguided.

None of us want cuts and we can argue about who is responsible for them happening, but the effects on council services and finances are almost certainly unavoidable.

bug eye says...
11:56pm Wed 27 Jul 11

warren, vasts amount of money was just wasted under labour and there were great inefficiencies. that is no way to run a council or government, the so called cuts are really efficiency savings that should be part of any business and necessary in order to get better value for money and cut waste. we are all now fully aware of waste so the greens need to be careful, especially if they are to raise concil tax for voting residents.

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree